Rep. Beth Van Duyne Slams Democrats Over DHS, ICE Funding During Government Shutdown
During the ongoing partial government shutdown, U.S. Representative Beth Van Duyne strongly criticized Democratic opposition to funding key federal agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In a firm statement, she argued that political deadlock is putting essential government services at risk.
Government Shutdown Puts Critical Agencies at Risk
Speaking during the debate, Van Duyne emphasized the importance of keeping the government open to ensure funding for crucial agencies such as FEMA, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). She warned that shutting down these agencies over political disagreements could have serious consequences for national security and public safety.
She argued that disagreements over immigration policy should not result in halting the operations of agencies responsible for disaster response, border protection, and transportation security.
Call to Pass the Senate Spending Bill
Van Duyne urged Congress to pass the Senate’s spending bill to restore government stability. While she voiced support for adding the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship for voting, she made it clear that the immediate priority should be keeping the government funded .
According to her, delaying the spending bill over additional provisions risks unnecessary disruption to government services.
ICE Funding Already Secured, She Says
Addressing concerns around immigration enforcement funding, Van Duyne clarified that ICE funding is already secured through 2029. She argued that blocking the current spending bill does not impact ICE operations but instead shuts down other essential agencies that Americans rely on daily .
Economic Impact and Warning to Congress
Van Duyne also highlighted what she described as positive economic outcomes from existing legislation, including lower rental rates and rising wages. She criticized lawmakers for what she called “playing games” with the appropriations process and urged Congress to move forward with passing the necessary funding bills .
Conclusion
The debate underscores the growing tensions in Washington as lawmakers clash over funding priorities during the partial government shutdown. Rep. Beth Van Duyne’s remarks reflect broader concerns about the impact of political gridlock on national security, emergency preparedness, and economic stability.
As negotiations continue, the focus remains on whether Congress can reach an agreement to reopen the government and ensure uninterrupted funding for vital federal agencies.